ArticlePLOS mental health2025
Exploring links between sensory processing sensitivity, professional quality of life, and negative affectivity in clinical and counselling psychologists.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resting-state functional connectivity related to empathy and sensory processing sensitivity.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Links between facets of alexithymia, self-rated interoception, and social perception.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health professionals, like professionals in other fields, experience a high risk of burnout. Situational as well as individual factors can increase this risk. The current study explored possible mediators of the relationships between the personality trait of sensory processing sensitivity (SPS) and the risk of poor professional quality of life and negative affectivity in a group of 95 clinical or counselling psychologists. Participants completed self-report measures of SPS, three proposed mediators (perceived negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, compassion satisfaction, and self-compassion) and five different outcome variables (burnout, secondary traumatic stress, stress, anxiety, and depression). Subscale scores on the measures of SPS were used to compute composite scores reflecting the strength of positive (SPS+) and negative (SPS-) trait clusters. The three proposed mediators were entered into each mediation model in parallel to allow us to tease apart the unique roles they played in explaining links between these two facets of SPS and our outcome variables. Reporting higher levels of SPS- traits predicted greater perceived pandemic burden and lower levels of self-compassion and compassion satisfaction. Links between SPS- traits and increased risk of all five negative outcomes were fully or partially mediated by at least two of the mediators. In contrast, high scores on the SPS+ trait cluster predicted higher levels of compassion satisfaction which predicted lower levels of burnout and secondary traumatic stress. This study identified several important risk and protective factors for clinical and counselling psychologists with SPS. By exploring the nature of the association between SPS and professional quality of life and mental health, the findings may inform proactive measures to support those with SPS who work in this vital area.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.