ArticlePLOS mental health2025
Lifestyle habits associated with elevated depressive symptoms among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study sought to explore the relationship between lifestyle changes among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and positivity on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D). We also hypothesized that physical inactivity which may have occurred under such behavioral restrictions would have had a particularly strong impact on CES-D positivity, and verified this hypothesis. This observational cohort study was carried out as a component of the mandatory health checkup program for employees at Juntendo University Hospital in Tokyo, Japan.in 2022. All 4,786 employees included in the study. Among them, 4700 valid responses and 4436 consents to the study were obtained. The prevalence of CES-D in 2022 was 32.5%, higher than that in 2019 before the COVID-19 pandemic (27.5%). Moreover, we summarized the 2022 employee variables for each CES-D result (negative vs. positive group). A notable difference was identified between the two groups concerning. age, sex, BMI, occupation, living alone, total working hours, and sleep duration. Logistic regression analysis was performed using the binary category as the outcome variable (i.e., CES-D positive findings). The factors related to positive CES-D that were not present in 2019 but only in 2022 were items such as "To smoke cigarettes" and "Less than 4,000 steps." We obtained results that support our hypothesis, such as the possibility that the impact of the "new lifestyle" on step count could affect depressive symptoms. Additionally, we were able to obtain findings that suggest a relationship between the pandemic's impact and depressive symptoms. When restrictions on movement are relaxed, immediate rebuilding of better lifestyle habits is necessary to maintain good mental health among healthcare workers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.