Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41662018›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2025

Accessing mental health care: A population-level exploration of the impact of immigration duration in the United States 2019-2023.

Suiqiong Fan, Evelyne Marie Piret

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suiqiong FanSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4240-4164
Evelyne Marie PiretSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9569-4989

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immigrant populations in the United States are known to experience worsening mental health as time since immigration increases, with consistently lower rates of mental health service engagement compared to their domestic-born counterparts. However, there is little evidence investigating how time since immigration affects mental health service use. Using 2019-2023 National Health Interview Survey data, this population-based study examines how time since immigration influences use of mental health services among immigrants reporting monthly or more depression or anxiety symptoms among civilian, non-institutionalized adults in the United States. Of the 6,201 participants (representing 11.9 million adults annually), 21.2% reported accessing medication or counselling. Multivariable logistic regression analyses found that recent immigrants (<5 years) had 46% lower odds of receiving care compared to those residing in the United States for ≥5 years (95% CI: 0.38, 0.78). Sensitivity analyses lent robustness to study findings. Effect modification analyses revealed no significant variations in the relationship between time since immigration and mental health service use across citizenship status, symptom severity, and COVID-19 periods. Findings highlight the need for targeted interventions and policy reforms to address disparities in mental health service use among immigrants, promoting equitable access and improving well-being for recent immigrants.

Identifiers

PMID41662018
PMCPMC12798438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.