Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41662000›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2025

Patterns of ongoing thought in the real world and their links to mental health and well-being.

Bridget Mulholland, Louis Chitiz, Raven Wallace, Brontë Mckeown, Michael Milham, Arno Klein, Robert Leech, Elizabeth Jefferies, Giulia Poerio, Jeffrey Wammes and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Bridget MulhollandDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0212-4413
Louis ChitizDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6433-9319
Raven WallaceDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Brontë MckeownNational Institute of Teaching, London, England.
Michael MilhamChild Mind Institute, New York City, New York, United States of America.
Arno KleinChild Mind Institute, New York City, New York, United States of America.
Robert LeechInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England.
Elizabeth JefferiesDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, England.
Giulia PoerioSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, England.
Jeffrey WammesDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Jeremy StewartDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6927-6871
Samyogita HardikarDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Jonathan SmallwoodDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The thoughts we experience in daily life have implications for our mental health and well-being. However, it is often difficult to measure thought patterns outside of laboratory conditions due to concerns about the voracity of measurements taken in daily life. To address this gap in the literature, our study set out to measure patterns of thought as they occur in daily life and assess the robustness of these measures and their associations with trait measurements of mental health and well-being. A sample of undergraduate participants completed multi-dimensional experience sampling surveys eight times per day for five days as they went around their normal lives. Principal Component Analysis reduced these data to identify the dimensions that explained the patterns of thought reported by our participants. We used linear modelling to map how these thought patterns related to the activities taking place at the time of the probe, highlighting good consistency within the sample, as well as substantial overlap with prior work. Multiple regression was used to examine associations between patterns of ongoing thought and aspects of mental health and well-being, highlighting a pattern of 'Intrusive Distraction' that had a positive association with anxiety, and a negative association with social well-being. Notably, this thought pattern tended to be most prevalent in solo activities and was relatively suppressed when interacting with other people (either in person or virtually). Our study, therefore, highlights the use of multi-dimensional experience sampling as a tool to understand how ongoing thought in daily life impacts on our mental health and well-being and establishes the important role social connectedness plays in the etiology of intrusive thinking.

Identifiers

PMID41662000
PMCPMC12798350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.