Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41661999›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2025

Breakdown of COVID effects on students' mental health at the beginning of the pandemic.

Elizabeth Amona, Alexis West, Afton White, Indranil Sahoo, David M Chan, Punit Gandhi, Yanjun Qian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elizabeth AmonaDepartment of Statistical Sciences and Operations Research, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.
Alexis WestDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7922-9910
Afton WhiteDepartment of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.
Indranil SahooDepartment of Statistical Sciences and Operations Research, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4960-7984
David M ChanDepartment of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6281-235X
Punit GandhiDepartment of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.
Yanjun QianDepartment of Statistical Sciences and Operations Research, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Students at a large mid-Atlantic university were surveyed during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic to assess its impact on their mental health. This study implements a combined analysis of categorical and text-based survey data using chi-squared tests and correspondence analysis to examine subgroup differences in the mental health impacts of the pandemic. When examining different subgroups, it was observed that first-generation students, who often cited stress and lack of motivation, reported being less affected by the pandemic compared to non-first generation students. The latter group more frequently mentioned experiencing depression, anxiety, isolation, challenges at home, lack of routine, and other mental health concerns. Additionally, female students appeared to be more impacted than male students, with female respondents highlighting issues of depression, lack of motivation and routines, anxiety, and other home-related mental health struggles. While other student subgroups were similarly affected, differences emerged in the specific ways they were impacted. STEM students were more likely to cite challenges with home life, feelings of isolation, and negative emotions, whereas non-STEM students more frequently reported depression, anxiety, and stress. Graduate students tended to describe the effects of COVID-19 in terms of depression, stress, and disrupted routines, while undergraduates were more likely to mention isolation, negative emotions, and challenges at home. Finally, age-based differences were also evident: younger students (18-20 years old) often cited home-related challenges, students aged 21-24 mentioned anxiety, lack of routine, and other mental health struggles, and the oldest group (25+ years) most frequently referenced stress and depression as consequences of the pandemic.

Identifiers

PMID41661999
PMCPMC12798451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.