ArticlePLOS mental health2025
Breakdown of COVID effects on students' mental health at the beginning of the pandemic.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Students at a large mid-Atlantic university were surveyed during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic to assess its impact on their mental health. This study implements a combined analysis of categorical and text-based survey data using chi-squared tests and correspondence analysis to examine subgroup differences in the mental health impacts of the pandemic. When examining different subgroups, it was observed that first-generation students, who often cited stress and lack of motivation, reported being less affected by the pandemic compared to non-first generation students. The latter group more frequently mentioned experiencing depression, anxiety, isolation, challenges at home, lack of routine, and other mental health concerns. Additionally, female students appeared to be more impacted than male students, with female respondents highlighting issues of depression, lack of motivation and routines, anxiety, and other home-related mental health struggles. While other student subgroups were similarly affected, differences emerged in the specific ways they were impacted. STEM students were more likely to cite challenges with home life, feelings of isolation, and negative emotions, whereas non-STEM students more frequently reported depression, anxiety, and stress. Graduate students tended to describe the effects of COVID-19 in terms of depression, stress, and disrupted routines, while undergraduates were more likely to mention isolation, negative emotions, and challenges at home. Finally, age-based differences were also evident: younger students (18-20 years old) often cited home-related challenges, students aged 21-24 mentioned anxiety, lack of routine, and other mental health struggles, and the oldest group (25+ years) most frequently referenced stress and depression as consequences of the pandemic.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.