Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41661987›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2025

The feasibility of a web-based resilience-building program to prevent stress among danish pregnant nulliparous women: A randomised controlled feasibility trial.

Monica Ladekarl, Ina Olmer Specht, Amanda Rodrigues Amorim Adegboye, Anne Brødsgaard, Ellen Aagaard Nøhr, Nanna Julie Olsen, Berit Lilienthal Heitmann

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03854331 (OBEAT - Beating Obesity), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03854331 nacompletednot on this map

OBEAT - Beating Obesity: A Feasibility Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBispebjerg HospitalRan2019 to 2020Enrolled124ConditionsPregnancy Related, Obesity, Childhood, StressArmsResilience program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Monica LadekarlResearch Unit for Diet and Health, the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0576-175X
Ina Olmer SpechtResearch Unit for Diet and Health, the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3114-4715
Amanda Rodrigues Amorim AdegboyeCentre for Healthcare Research, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Anne BrødsgaardDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5029-9480
Ellen Aagaard NøhrDepartment of Clinical Research, Research Unit for Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7039-1105
Nanna Julie OlsenResearch Unit for Diet and Health, the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Berit Lilienthal HeitmannResearch Unit for Diet and Health, the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress during pregnancy has been found to modify aspects of fetal development, including organ maturation and neurodevelopmental problems, and to increase the risk of preterm birth and lower birth weight. Studies have shown lower stress levels and cortisol release in people with high resilience. To date, no randomized controlled trial (RCT) has evaluated the effect of a resilience-building digital program to prevent and cope with stress in pregnancy. This study assessed the feasibility of conducting a web-based resilience-building RCT among otherwise healthy pregnant women. In total, 124 nulliparous women were included at their first antenatal appointment in gestational weeks 14-20. The women were randomly allocated to the intervention group consisting of a web-based resilience-building program lasting 20 weeks or to a control group receiving usual care. This study evaluated recruitment, attrition, adherence, satisfaction, and compliance rates using questionnaires on adherence and satisfaction and qualitative phone interviews with pregnant women to investigate the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention. The adherence rate was 85%. The overall satisfaction with participation in the study was six on an 8-point Likert Scale, ranging from "terrible" to "fantastic". In the intervention group, 58% had a "good" or "very good" experience with the program, and 62% reported still using knowledge and methods in the program two months postpartum. At follow-up, 57% had completed all four questionnaires. Some women described that using resilience exercises during pregnancy and birth was helpful for their overall well-being. However, some women found receiving email reminders of the exercises stressful. Overall, our feasibility study showed that the intervention was feasible and acceptable. Before conducting a full-scale trial, minor modifications to the program and the delivery can be considered to improve acceptability and response rate. The trial was registered in the clinicaltrials.gov database (ID NCT03854331) on 26/02/2019 and approved by the Danish Data Protection (J.nr. VD-2019-13) and the National Committee on Health Research Ethics - Capital Region (J.nr. H-19000990).

Identifiers

PMID41661987
PMCPMC12798499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.