ArticlePLOS mental health2025
Association of company downsizing with the risk of mental distress among employees in the Norwegian working population.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies indicate that downsizing can have a negative influence on the mental health of employees who keep their jobs. This study examines how downsizing impacts the mental health of remaining employees, focusing on their proximity to downsizing and ratings of involvement, information, and support during downsizing. Based on data from three iterations (2013, 2016 and 2019) of a nationwide survey in Norway, we included respondents employed by the same company in two consecutive surveys. We used logistic regression models adjusted for age and sex to calculate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for incident mental distress in the second survey among employees without distress in the first survey. Compared to unexposed employees (n = 2,571), the OR (95% CI) for employees exposed to downsizing was 1.57 (1.16 - 2.13) overall (n = 1,300). When differentiating exposed employees by proximity, the ORs were 1.78 (1.26 - 2.49) for those with downsizing in their own department (n = 784) and 1.26 (0.79 - 1.95) for those with downsizing in another department (n = 516), respectively. Furthermore, among employees exposed in their own department, the ORs differed according to their rating of involvement, information, and support during downsizing: 1.27 (0.82 - 1.91) for sufficient (n = 580) and 5.02 (3.03 - 8.04) for insufficient (n = 149). Downsizing was associated with a higher risk of mental distress among employees who kept their job, but the findings also suggest that companies might reduce this risk through employment involvement, information and support to employees affected the most by downsizing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.