ArticlePLOS mental health2025
The impact of psychiatric decision units on mental health crisis care pathways: a synthetic control study.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychiatric crisis care is under great pressure, with the number of psychiatric presentations to emergency departments increasing and inpatient wards operating with occupancy rates above recommended levels. Internationally, hospital-based short-stay crisis units (named Psychiatric Decision Units; (PDU) in the UK) have been introduced to address these challenges, but the current evidence for their effectiveness is limited. We estimated the effects of PDUs in four geographic locations in England, linked to three National Health Service (NHS) mental health trusts and six NHS acute hospital trusts. Using national data sets to create synthetic controls from areas without PDUs (following the generalised synthetic control method), we estimated trust-wide changes to the primary outcomes of psychiatric inpatient admissions and psychiatric presentations to emergency departments (ED), compared to the synthetic controls, alongside secondary outcomes. We used meta-analysis to robustly combine outcomes. We analysed NHS hospital activity data for adults aged between 18 and 75 years covering 24 months preceding and following the introduction of each PDU (November 2012 to January 2021). We found no significant impacts of PDUs on primary outcomes, except at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust with 1.5 fewer psychiatric presentations to ED per 10,000 trust population per month (relative difference: 24.9%, p = 0.034) than the synthetic control. We found mixed effects of the opening of PDUs on secondary outcomes. Meta-analyses indicated a significantly lower mean length of stay for psychiatric admissions (-6.4 days, p < 0.001) for patients in mental health trusts with a PDU compared to the synthetic control and no significant effects on other outcomes. Heterogeneity of effect across sites probably reflects variation in PDU configuration and implementation. Further research should explore the intended aims of PDUs alongside how they operate in practice. Registration: The study is registered with the ISRCTN (ISRCTN77588384).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.