Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41661938›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2025

Developing programme theory for a place-based, systems change approach to adolescent mental health: A developmental realist evaluation.

Kate Allen, Anna March, Bianca Alexandrescu, Julie Harris, Rachael Stemp, Siying Li, Laura Kennedy, Karuna Davies, Tamanna Malhotra, Ediane Santana de Lima and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kate AllenDepartment of Public Health and Sport Sciences, Children and Young People's Mental Health Research Collaboration, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0870-7209
Anna MarchDepartment of Public Health and Sport Sciences, Children and Young People's Mental Health Research Collaboration, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1811-6090
Bianca AlexandrescuDepartment of Clinical, Health and Educational Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6468-218X
Julie HarrisDartington Service Design Lab, Buckfastleigh, United Kingdom.
Rachael StempAnna Freud Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Siying LiDepartment of Clinical, Health and Educational Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Laura KennedyDepartment of Clinical, Health and Educational Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Karuna DaviesDepartment of Clinical, Health and Educational Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Tamanna MalhotraDepartment of Public Health and Sport Sciences, Children and Young People's Mental Health Research Collaboration, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Ediane Santana de LimaDartington Service Design Lab, Buckfastleigh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1523-4181
Tim HobbsDartington Service Design Lab, Buckfastleigh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7232-291X
Niran RehillUniversity College London Partners, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4179-0996
Jenny ShandDepartment of Clinical, Health and Educational Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Peter FonagyDepartment of Clinical, Health and Educational Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0229-0091
Steve PillingDepartment of Clinical, Health and Educational Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Vashti BerryDepartment of Public Health and Sport Sciences, Children and Young People's Mental Health Research Collaboration, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6438-3731

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kailo is a prevention framework that supports local communities to co-design evidence-informed strategies to address the social determinants of adolescent mental health and wellbeing. Similar place-based initiatives exist internationally but research into the mechanisms of change and contextual drivers is limited. Understanding how and why Kailo functions is crucial for refining the framework before it is implemented in different contexts and for informing the focus of an impact evaluation. We conducted a developmental, realist-informed evaluation to investigate how and why the Kailo framework functions, for whom and under what circumstances. The first phase of the evaluation involved a rapid realist review, observations of key processes, key informant interviews, and document analysis. These methods informed the development of a series of initial programme theories. The second phase involved testing and refining these initial programme theories through further interviews and focus groups with key informants. A realist dialogic approach was used throughout, and our work was supported by two Young People's Advisory Groups who provided input on both the approach and theory generation. We generated a series of programme theories that shed light on the underlying mechanisms through which the Kailo framework works, the ways in which context acts as a catalyst for change, and the outcomes prioritised. These programme theories fall into six themes: 1) Alignment; 2) Time; 3) Credibility; 4) Accessible Spaces; 5) Building a Shared Understanding/Mission; and 6) Creating Hope that Change is Possible. Our study has informed the further development of the Kailo framework and lays the groundwork for a subsequent contributory impact evaluation to assess how Kailo contributes to system-level change and, ultimately, improvements in adolescent mental health and wellbeing. The programme theories generated also contribute to a wider understanding of how complex place-based approaches may function.

Identifiers

PMID41661938
PMCPMC12798369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.