ArticlePLOS mental health2025
Lifestyle behaviors and mental health of health professional students during COVID-19, as measured by the CDC's BRFSS, for the HOLISTIC cohort study.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The World Health Organization estimates a 25% increase in anxiety and depression prevalence during the COVID-19 pandemic. 50% of surveyed US healthcare workers reported increased anxiety, and 27% of Chinese health professional students reported psychological distress. The mental health of US health professional students and their coping mechanisms, especially during an adverse time such as the pandemic, is less well understood. This study examined the US health professional students' lifestyle behaviors and their association with the prevalence of poor mental health days. 890 students across seven health sciences colleges in 2020 and/or 2021 were recruited using convenience sampling. Participants completed socio-demographic questions and items from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Behavioral Risk Factor and Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2019 survey. The participants reported a median of 7 days with poor mental health (IQR: 3-15 days) in the past 30 days. Female sex (OR 1.70, 95% CI [1.21, 2.38]), Asian race (OR 1.47, 95% CI [1.06, 2.06]), adverse childhood events (OR 2.01, 95% CI [1.45-2.78]), and frequent cannabis use (OR = 2.03, 95% CI [1.14-3.61]) were each associated with an increased risk of poor mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exercise (OR 0.64, 95% CI [0.42-0.97]) was found to be a protective factor during COVID-19. These results indicate the need to design, implement, and evaluate mental health support services for health professional students, particularly among certain demographic groups. Students who are frequent cannabis users or have significant childhood trauma are more likely to have poor mental health and, as such, may benefit from additional support. A lifestyle psychiatry approach to overall wellness may offer students valuable and holistic coping mechanisms that incorporate lifestyle behaviors known to positively impact mental health.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.