Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41661914›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2025

Metacognitive biases in anxiety-depression and compulsivity extend across perception and memory.

Tricia X F Seow, Stephen M Fleming, Tobias U Hauser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Towards an integrative neuroscience of metacognition.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tricia X F SeowMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5930-8929
Stephen M FlemingMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Tobias U HauserMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metacognitive biases are characteristic of common mental health disorders like depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, recent transdiagnostic approaches consistently contradict traditional clinical studies, with overconfidence in perception among highly compulsive individuals versus underconfident memory in OCD patients. To reconcile these differences, we investigated whether these metacognitive divergences may arise due to cognitive domain-specific effects, comorbid overshadowing effects, and/or different manifestations at disparate levels of a local to global metacognitive hierarchy. Using a transdiagnostic individual differences approach with a general population sample (N = 327), we quantified metacognitive patterns across memory and perception. Across cognitive domains, we found that underconfidence was linked to anxiety-depression and overconfidence was linked to compulsivity. While both anxiety-depression and compulsivity were predominantly explained by global low self-esteem, other associations varied across a confidence hierarchy, with compulsivity exhibiting more specific alterations at more local metacognitive levels. Our results support a domain-general alteration of metacognition across mental health dimensions, with differential contributions from distinct levels of a metacognitive hierarchy.

Identifiers

PMID41661914
PMCPMC12798496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.