ArticlePLOS mental health2025
Metacognitive biases in anxiety-depression and compulsivity extend across perception and memory.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards an integrative neuroscience of metacognition.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026Review
- Drops in confidence precede symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Cognitive arbitration between candidate dimensions of psychopathology.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Building worlds of your own: the functional role of metacognitive bias in metacognition.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The metacognitive paradox of OCD: confidence is globally reduced but shows increased sensitivity to local evidence.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metacognitive biases are characteristic of common mental health disorders like depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, recent transdiagnostic approaches consistently contradict traditional clinical studies, with overconfidence in perception among highly compulsive individuals versus underconfident memory in OCD patients. To reconcile these differences, we investigated whether these metacognitive divergences may arise due to cognitive domain-specific effects, comorbid overshadowing effects, and/or different manifestations at disparate levels of a local to global metacognitive hierarchy. Using a transdiagnostic individual differences approach with a general population sample (N = 327), we quantified metacognitive patterns across memory and perception. Across cognitive domains, we found that underconfidence was linked to anxiety-depression and overconfidence was linked to compulsivity. While both anxiety-depression and compulsivity were predominantly explained by global low self-esteem, other associations varied across a confidence hierarchy, with compulsivity exhibiting more specific alterations at more local metacognitive levels. Our results support a domain-general alteration of metacognition across mental health dimensions, with differential contributions from distinct levels of a metacognitive hierarchy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.