ArticlePLOS mental health2025
Apoyando a la juventud [supporting the youth]: Latinx caregivers' assessment of youth mental health service need and utilization on the Caregiver Support Services Questionnaire.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Established service utilization measures depend on labor- and time-intensive interviews that limit the feasibility of large-scale studies seeking to understand utilization patterns of youth mental health services (MHS) among Latinx families. The present study describes the development of the Caregiver Support Services Questionnaire (CSSQ), a self-administered measure of perceived need for and utilization of common youth MHS. Data from 598 Latinx caregivers of youths ages 6-18 on the CSSQ were examined to (a) determine whether the CSSQ can be represented by cumulative scores and individual indicators and (b) establish the construct validity of the CSSQ. Correlations between CSSQ items had small to moderate effect sizes, suggesting that item responses within each scale were interrelated but provided unique information. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that unidimensional factors for the perceived need and service utilization scales fit the data well and have excellent internal consistency. The severity of youth emotional and behavioral problems was generally associated with increased odds of reporting support service need and utilization on the CSSQ, which provides support for the construct validity of the cumulative scales and individual indicators. Findings support the use of the CSSQ as both cumulative scores and individual items to study support service need and utilization patterns associated with youth mental health problems among Latinx families.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.