Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41661900›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2025

A co-produced review of the experiences of Black male detention under mental health legislation: Challenging discrimination in psychiatry using The Silences Framework.

Kim Heyes, Isaiah Brodrick, Debbie Best, Kenny Thompson, Caroline Leah, Eula Miller, Elaine Craig, Laura Serrant, Jeremy Dixon, Anna Bergqvist and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Kim HeyesSchool of Nursing and Public Health, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9029-545X
Isaiah BrodrickGaddum, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8865-1736
Debbie BestSchool of Nursing and Public Health, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1845-0229
Kenny ThompsonSchool of Nursing and Public Health, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Caroline LeahDepartment of Social Care and Social Work, Manchester Metropolitan University, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6659-7848
Eula MillerSchool of Nursing and Public Health, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0609-2634
Elaine CraigSchool of Nursing and Public Health, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-3956
Laura SerrantSchool of Nursing and Public Health, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9382-9859
Jeremy DixonCentre for Adult Social Care Research, Cardiff University, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0656-5646
Anna BergqvistDepartment of Philosophy, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Tella LanttaDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7715-7573
Hári SewellHS Consultancy, Kington, Herefordshire, United Kingdom.
Clair TourishSchool of Nursing and Public Health, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0012-0649
Rachel WhyteDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0568-4339
Joy DuxburyResearch for the Institute of Health, University of Cumbria, Lancaster, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1772-6874
Alina Haines-DelmontSchool of Nursing and Public Health, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6989-0943

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of detentions under mental health legislation is growing, disproportionately impacting Black men. Previous research into the over-detention of Black people is repetitive and solutions to reduce disparities are ineffective, not enacted, or outdated. This review is original and novel in using a lived experience lens within the Silences framework, to interpret and validate review findings and make actionable recommendations to enable change, reduce Black men's detention rates and improve experiences. The systematic review searched three databases: EBSCO, ProQuest, and PMC. Search terms included: ethnicity: Black African Caribbean; gender: male; and detention: detained under mental health legislation. Searches were conducted in September 2021 and February 2024 and included papers from 2000 to 2024. The review was conducted using the NIHR systematic review protocol. Searches resulted in 15,300 papers, which were reduced to 34 papers for inclusion in the thematic analysis. People with lived experience on the review team explored the Silences missing in the literature and co-developed the findings and recommendations. Three themes were developed and are presented as 'Screaming Silences' - a concept that amplifies what is known (by patients, family and friends, professionals, and others), but is not explicitly discussed within literature: (1) contextual identity; (2) culture, spirituality, and religion; and (3) power, language, and communication. People with lived experience discussed what these themes meant to them. Their views are key to flipping the narrative, and support change for Black men compulsorily detained in mental health settings. Findings show that academic understanding of the detrimental treatment and care of Black men has barely changed in twenty years. The recommendations centre on: patient involvement and clear communication; reducing disparities through anti-discriminatory policies and practice; the promotion of cultural competence; community campaigns, collaboration, and support for carers; monitoring and auditing; and improving future research through co-production.

Identifiers

PMID41661900
PMCPMC12798175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.