ArticlePLOS mental health2025
Reshaping youth mental health care for optimal system-level outcomes: A dynamic modelling analysis.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovation in Acute Adolescent Mental Healthcare: Evaluating a Responsive and Sustainable Mental Healthcare Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Young people's perceptions and recommendations for conversational generative artificial intelligence in youth mental health.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the critical role of effective treatment in limiting the adverse socioeconomic and health impacts of youth mental disorders, investment in mental health services is widely recognised to be insufficient to meet current demand for care. Using a dynamic model of resource-constrained services provision (constant total expenditure), we assessed the potential for improving mental health care outcomes for young people (aged 12-25 years) through changes in services system composition (i.e., the division of total services capacity between primary care services and specialised services) and policies for managing initial access to specialised treatment. Model analysis indicates that services delivery reforms facilitating direct engagement with specialised care, irrespective of clinical stage, are capable of significantly improving system-level (aggregate) outcomes, reducing total illness progression and disengagement from services, and increasing total treatment-mediated recovery. Restricting the ability of young people with relatively mild mental health problems to access specialised care (an explicit aim of stepped care models) effectively constrains the capacity of specialised services to promote recovery and prevent illness progression (both of which are more probable at earlier clinical stages), and does not make best use of available resources; better system-level outcomes are achieved when young people receive more effective, specialised treatment as early as possible. Provided that young people are not restricted to accessing specialised care only via primary care services, progression and disengagement decline as the proportion of mental health care expenditure allocated to specialised services increases, while the optimal proportion of young people directly accessing specialised care approaches a value of 1, suggesting that the largest improvements in services system performance are likely to be achieved by expanding specialised services capacity with the aim of providing all young people presenting for care with direct access to specialised treatment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.