ArticlePLOS mental health2025
Improving recognition of common mental health disorders in Cambodia: Validation of the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 and development of a brief mental health screener.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intimate partner violence and the dual burden of anxiety and depression among women in Zambia: Spatial inequalities and implications for the sustainable development goals.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2026Article
- Stratified and geographic patterns of depression and anxiety in Mozambican women: Mental health policy implications.PloS one · 2026Article
- Factorial invariance of the Spanish version of the PHQ-9 by gender and country in Latin America and the Caribbean.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bear 80% of the burden from common mental health disorders like depression and anxiety. One LMIC, Cambodia, has a mental health care gap due to history of genocide and civil war, persistent poverty, and under-resourced mental health system. Collaborative care models can improve access to and quality of mental health care by integrating care into existing health care infrastructure. While tools like the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 are widely used to detect unmet mental health needs and provide measurement-based care, their validity has not been established for many LMICs. We therefore sought to validate the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 and develop a brief mental health screener in the Cambodian context. This study was guided by an advisory committee of local mental health, health care, social work, and public health policymakers, practitioners, and researchers. The PHQ-9, GAD-7, and C-SSI were used to identify possible screening items and the HSCL and HTQ were used as criterion instruments to detect depression, anxiety and trauma. Pearson's correlation was used to assess validity and k-fold cross validation was used to identify which combination of items were most predictive of mental health disorders. Among 498 patients (mean(SD) age 51(12.8) years, 48.6% women, 74.4% married), 19% and 13% screened positive for depression and for anxiety using the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7, respectively. Both the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 were strongly correlated with the HSCL and HTQ. The combination of two PHQ-9 items (sleep, worthlessness) and one GAD-7 item (nervousness) most accurately predicted mental health conditions (AUC = 0.980). The PHQ-9 and GAD-7 were valid in Cambodia, and we identified several items to screen for emotional distress. We are currently using these tools in a collaborative care model pilot in urban and rural settings and welcome others application to support Cambodian mental health equity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.