ArticlePLOS mental health2024
Barriers and facilitators to identifying depression in adolescents: A cross-cultural qualitative study in Brazil, Nepal, and Nigeria.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is growing global interest in early detection and engagement with care for adolescents experiencing depression. However, there is limited information on perceived barriers and facilitators to engagement with adolescent mental health care in low- and middle-income countries. Accordingly, this study examined perceived barriers and facilitators to the identification of depression in adolescents in Brazil, Nepal, and Nigeria. Key informant interviews (n = 153) and focus group discussions (n = 31) were conducted in Brazil, Nepal, and Nigeria with adolescents, parents, health care workers, social workers, teachers, and other stakeholders to explore perceived barriers to identifying depression in adolescents. This study employed a deductive theory-informed codebook enhanced with inductive codes and analyzed using constant comparison by a team of 8 multi-site researchers. The framework approach was used to construct overarching themes and to synthesize a theoretical model. Stigma and a lack of knowledge about the signs and symptoms of depression were perceived as major barriers to the identification of depression across all three settings. Three other themes emerged:(1) role of stakeholders in identifying depression, (2) training or education as a facilitator to identifying depression, and, (3) the role of technology as barrier or facilitator depending on its specific application. Teachers and parents were the primary stakeholders identified as being able to recognize early signs and symptoms of depression in adolescents. Respondents described training through public awareness campaigns, school policy, or social media as interventions to improve depression identification, but noted that social media could also contribute to exacerbating symptoms of depression. These findings suggest there are common perceived barriers and facilitators to the identification of depression in adolescents across diverse cultural contexts. These findings can inform the development of culturally sensitive strategies to address stigma and increase mental health literacy, and ultimately, to improve engagement with treatment and prevention for adolescents experiencing depression.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.