ArticlePLOS mental health2025
Exploring urban mental health using mobile EEG - a systematic review.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Techniques for Artifact Detection and Artifact Category Identification in Electroencephalography from Wearable Devices.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Urban environmental exposure as a factor in adaptive neuromodulation: a conceptual framework.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Exploring urban mental health using mobile EEG - a systematic review.PLOS mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the ongoing trend of urbanization and the increased prevalence of specific mental disorders in urban settings, there is a need to better understand the link between urban living and mental health. Recent advances in urban mental health research have leveraged mobile electroencephalography to explore how brain electrical signals are influenced by urban stressors and resources. This study aims to synthesize the evidence from mobile electroencephalography measurements in the context of urban mental health. A systematic literature research was conducted in the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL in September 2023. The present review includes primary studies that used in-situ electroencephalography in real urban environments published since 2013. Four independent reviewers conducted the screening, while two researchers performed data extraction using Microsoft Excel and assessed risk of bias using the Effective Public Healthcare Panacea Project Quality Assessment Tool. The review has been pre-registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (PROSPERO) under the registration number CRD42023471636. Fifteen studies were identified, primarily examining power in alpha, beta, and theta frequencies in urban areas compared to less urbanized environments. Study findings exhibited significant heterogeneity; while some studies noted heightened brain activity in urban environments, others observed reductions compared to less urbanized or greener regions. Notably, certain demographic cohorts, such as adolescents, have been understudied. Moreover, descriptions of exposures were often inadequate for ensuring replicability, and gender considerations were seldom integrated into analyses. This systematic review provides insights into an emerging field of research which appears to be suffering from small sample sizes and a lack of methodological transparency and consistency. Interpretation of the seemingly contradictory results requires future studies to be more rigorous in documenting urban exposures and choice of brain components under investigation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.