Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41661811›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2024

Voices from the ground: Qualitative perspectives on Ugandan national mental health system strengths, challenges, and recommendations.

Lekie Dwanyen, Ibrahim Luberenga, Ronald Asiimwe, Pendo Galukande, Adrian Blow, Rosco Kasujja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lekie DwanyenMichigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4543-6890
Ibrahim LuberengaMichigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8050-8642
Ronald AsiimweUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Pendo GalukandeMichigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7203-6098
Adrian BlowMichigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9853-661X
Rosco KasujjaMakerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9197-5123

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health capacity building is a growing priority in Ugandan healthcare systems. Despite increased governmental attention to community mental health and mental healthcare needs, no empirical assessments document qualitative perspectives from stakeholders in the Ugandan mental health system. The goal of the current needs assessment study was to systematically explore stakeholders' perceptions of strengths, challenges, and recommendations for enhancing capacity in the national mental health system in Uganda. Using ethnographic research methods, data were collected from 15 key informant interviews and four community focus groups with a total of 44 stakeholders involved in mental healthcare in Uganda. Thematic analyses of data yielded several themes in each domain, including 1) system strengths reflected in the existing policy and action plan, free medications, growing private sector, and partnerships and collaborations; 2) system challenges including socioeconomic constraints, stigma, and limited family engagement; and 3) recommendations surrounding enhanced education and training, integrating systemic approaches, and policy advocacy. We describe clinical, research, and policy implications that can inform systemic mental health efforts in Uganda and comparable global settings.

Identifiers

PMID41661811
PMCPMC12798241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.