ArticlePLOS mental health2025
Determining how individuals manage their driving anxiety.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anxiety caused by driving (e.g., driving anxiety) can greatly impact individuals' mobility and lead to partial or complete driving cessation. Previous research focused on the causes of driving anxiety and quantifying its severity. No studies have centered on how individuals manage their symptoms. The purpose of this study was to learn how and what management strategies individuals utilize to combat anxiety triggers while driving. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals from Jan-March 2024. Participants had to be ≥18 years of age at time of study, reside in the United States, and experienced or were concerned about their driving anxiety. Participants were recruited through email and advertisements using non-probability sampling techniques. The interviews were conducted using a standardized, pilot tested script and were audio recorded and transcribed. A thematic analysis with inductive coding was performed to determine themes. Ten female participants (mean age 40.8 years) were recruited. Five themes emerged: past trauma, 2) environmental factors and their inability to control them, 3) within and out-of-vehicle coping strategies (subthemes: distraction, reliance on others, and avoidance), 4) out of control in unfamiliar situations or fear of hurting self, others, or property, and 5) honoring responsibilities, being independent and maintaining relationships. While management strategies were individualistic, most participants attempted to distract themselves from their feelings, relied on others to deal with their symptoms, or avoided situations that aggravated their anxiety. These management strategies enabled participants to continue driving in spite of their symptoms and allowed them to honor commitments, maintain independence, and sustain relationships. However, these strategies could also inadvertently impact individuals' safety while driving and/or their mental health. These findings could inform clinical practice and future research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.