ArticlePLOS mental health2025
Evidence-based practice among mental health professionals in Puerto Rico: Attitudes, knowledge, resources, and treatments.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evidence-based practice attitude scale for Latinx mental health professionals: a novel application of confirmatory factor analysis.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing prevalence of mental health disorders in Puerto Rico necessitates the use of efficacious mental health interventions, such as Evidence-Based Treatments (EBTs), to promote positive outcomes within this underserved population. This study aimed to describe the use of psychosocial interventions with different levels of evidence for efficacy (i.e., well-established, probably or possibly efficacious, and experimental) among mental health professionals in Puerto Rico (i.e., social workers, psychologists, counselors; N = 237). A quantitative cross-sectional design was employed to analyze data collected between October and December 2021. Chi-square tests of independence were conducted to examine differences in the self-reported use of interventions across professional disciplines and agency types. A significant portion of the sample (71.7%) reported using at least one intervention with well-established evidence. Psychologists most frequently used these well-established interventions in their practice, followed by counselors and social workers. Participants working in private agencies also endorsed higher utilization of various EBTs than those in public agencies. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the correlation between favorable attitudes, knowledge, and training on these practices and the self-reported use of specific interventions. Favorable attitudes towards Evidence-Based Practices (EBPs) were related to increased use of mindfulness therapy, a well-established intervention. Greater knowledge and training on EBTs were found to correlate with self-reported use of interventions with well-established and probably efficacious evidence. Findings suggest that mental health professionals in Puerto Rico use some well-established EBTs, but the modalities used varied based on a variety of factors. Our findings suggest that increasing knowledge and agency training on EBTs may be an effective way to promote the use of interventions with well-established and probably efficacious evidence. Implications for research, practice, education, and policy development in Puerto Rico are discussed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.