ArticlePLOS mental health2025
Barriers experienced by undergraduate students to access to mental health services: Results from a Canadian study.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined the experiences of Canadian undergraduate students accessing mental healthcare between November 2022 to February 2023. We specifically assessed the impact of social determinants of health (i.e., gender, socioeconomic status, immigration status, English as a second language). Participants were recruited through social media platforms and by undergraduate program administrators at Canadian universities. Participants were asked to provide demographic information, answer questions about their experiences accessing mental healthcare, and to complete the mental health continuum short form (MHC-SF). Descriptive statistics and linear regression models were used to assess the association between MHC-SF and social determinants of health (e.g.: demographics, language, immigration status). Of 1098 students invited to participate, 365 participants completed the study (completion rate: 33.2%). Their mean age (SD) was 21.4 (4.6) years; 73.6% were female and 45.7% identified as non-White. Overall, the mean (SD) MHC-SF score of participants was 2.36 (0.99) out of 5. Students with low SES had lower MHC-SF scores (mean 2.08 vs 2.45; p = 0.003). The multivariable analysis showed that low SES (β -0.36; 95%CI: -0.60 to -0.12) and female gender (β -0.29; 95%CI: -0.58 to -0.012) were associated with lower MHC-SF scores. Additionally, being White was associated with higher MHC-SF scores (β -0.29; 95%CI: -0.44 to 0.54). Age, English as a second language, and immigration status were not significant predictors of mental health. High levels of stress, negative perceptions of the mental healthcare system, and limited access were the more common reported themes in the qualitative analysis. In our cohort, university students from across Canada had low MHC scores. Social determinants of health (e.g., low SES, being non-White, and identifying as a woman) were independent predictors of low MCH scores. Further studies are needed to identify specific groups at higher risk as well as strategies to overcome the suboptimal mental health among Canadian students.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.