ArticlePLOS mental health2025
Moderation of financial stress and cardiovascular disease risk in black catholics: A social-ecological pathway utilizing latent class and structural equation analyses.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic financial stress drives cardiovascular disease (CVD), yet its impact within Black Catholic communities remains understudied. Using a profile-based, socio-ecological framework, we centered chronic financial stress and low Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores, as correlates of downstream health risk, and we modeled racial discrimination as an upstream moderator that intensifies this trajectory.
methodsCross-sectional data from 285 racially and religiously diverse adults were analyzed. Latent class analysis (LCA) identified distinct stress profiles, and structural equation modeling (SEM) tested pathways from financial stress, perceived stress, discrimination, and low MCS to a Black Catholic profile and subsequent chronic stress risk (CHRONRSK). Model fit was evaluated with χ², RMSEA, CFI, TLI, and SRMR indices; indirect effects were estimated with bias-corrected bootstraps.
resultsLCA revealed three profiles-Chronic, Life Trauma, and Daily Hassles. The SEM containing financial stress and discrimination showed excellent fit (χ²(3)= 3.98, p = .26; RMSEA = .034; CFI = .979), whereas substituting the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) produced poor fit (RMSEA = .131; CFI = .747). Financial stress (β = .124, p = .045) and discrimination (β = .227, p < .001) significantly predicted the Black Catholic profile, which strongly predicted chronic stress (β = .761, p < .001). Low Mental Component Summary scores neither predicted the profile (β = -.009, p = .75) nor mediated the pathway. PSS was uninformative, reinforcing that these downstream health risks stem from upstream structural forces, not individual psychology.
conclusionsNinety percent (90.6%) of low-income Black Catholics fell below the national averages for Mental Component Summary scores. Chronic financial stress explained nearly half of this mental-health disparity (η² = 0.489)-evidence that upstream burdens, not individual pathology, drive downstream outcomes. For Black Catholics, chronic financial stress and racial discrimination-rather than generalized stress (PSS) or isolated mental-health scores-emerge as the most salient yet under-recognized moderators of chronic financial-stress risk. These findings call into question the adequacy of conventional stress models and underscore the need for upstream, equity-driven interventions. Public health strategies must advance upstream structural interventions to counter systemic forces sustaining financial stress and CVD risk.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.