ArticlePLOS mental health2025
Perceptions of the Mamma Mia program, an internet-based prevention strategy for perinatal depression symptoms.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04300894 ("Mamma Mia" for Perinatal Health and Wellness), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
"Mamma Mia" for Perinatal Health and Wellness
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Mamma Mia program is an internet-based intervention designed to prevent and/or intervene with perinatal mental health symptoms, such as depression symptoms. The purpose of this mixed-methods study, which occurred in a virtual setting, was to evaluate the perceived acceptability, obtrusiveness, and preliminary perceived usefulness of the Mamma Mia program by postpartum mothers who had access to the program through a larger parent study. Quantitative data on perceived obtrusiveness of the program (Unobtrusiveness Scale) were collected from 1772 pregnant women participating in a larger, three-arm randomized controlled parent study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04300894); qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured one-on-one interviews with a subset of these postpartum mothers (n = 55). Participants reported they found the program to be beneficial, emphasizing its guided content, focus on self-care, integration of mindfulness and educational components, and trustworthiness. Participants appreciated the structured nature of the program and expressed a high level of trust in the program, which was crucial for its perceived value and effectiveness. However, reported obtrusiveness of the intervention increased as participants progressed through the postpartum period, suggesting an evolving user experience with the program. Participants offered suggestions for improvement to the program, such as that the program should be app-based, the program should be available for partners to use, and that the program requires some updates to images and postpartum content. Overall, the study findings highlight the participants' perceptions that the program is acceptable and useful. Future work is warranted to explore the enhancements proposed by participants to further optimize the program's impact.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.