Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41661740›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2024

Developing standards for virtual delivery of mental health services in Canadian primary care: A qualitative study and modified Delphi process.

Abban Yusuf, Ginetta Salvalaggio, Osnat Melamed, Stephanie Montesanti, Helen Atherton, Lucie Langford, Saadia Sediqzadah, Tamara Do Amaral, Braden O'Neill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abban YusufMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6189-6857
Ginetta SalvalaggioDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Osnat MelamedDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Stephanie MontesantiSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Helen AthertonPrimary Care Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, England.
Lucie LangfordMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Saadia SediqzadahDepartment of Psychiatry, St. Michael's Hospital, MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Tamara Do AmaralPopulation Health and Value-based Health Systems, Ontario Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Braden O'NeillMAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2164-8263

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Canada, public health measures necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a rapid onset and prolonged, widespread increase in the use of virtual primary care services, including for mental health conditions. Our aim was to develop standards on virtual delivery of mental health services in primary care in Canada using information obtained from an earlier rapid review as well as participant feedback obtained through interviews and a focus group. We developed standards using three interlinked processes. First, we completed a rapid review of guidelines regarding virtual primary mental health care services. We then invited health care workers and people with lived experience of mental health concerns to participate in a focus group and interviews. Finally, members of the study team drafted standards and shared them with an advisory group, who reviewed their feasibility, phrasing, and acceptability through a modified Delphi process. Standards ranked as having less than 100% feasibility and acceptability were brought to a virtual discussion of the advisory group to finalize the list. Seven participants were recruited into the focus group and interviews. We identified three themes: (i) patients' and providers' agreement about expectations regarding virtual care, (ii) accessibility and equity, and (iii) safety planning in the delivery of virtual care. We drafted 18 standards on virtual primary mental health care delivery that were reviewed by an advisory group of identified experts. Thirteen standards were included in the final list. The standards bring attention to continuity of care, and resources and information that should be given to patients to further health equity. These standards provide guidance for the organization and delivery of virtual mental health services in Canadian and international primary care, particularly within the context of single payer health systems.

Identifiers

PMID41661740
PMCPMC12798391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.