ArticlePLOS mental health2024
Does a specialized assessment improve vocational outcomes for people on sick leave with a suspected common mental disorder? Results from the Mental Health Assessment Study (MeHAS).
Article in PLOS mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Danish Ibbis Trials for Sickness Absentees with Common Mental Disorders: A Phase 4 Prospective Study Comparing Randomized Trial and Real-World Data.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Denmark, 50% of those on long-term sick leave are affected by common mental disorders (CMDs), and it has been argued that detection in primary care has been insufficient. The Mental Health Assessment Study (MeHAS) assesses if specialized mental health assessments can enhance return to work for this group. This study aimed to estimate the effect of a specialized mental health assessment for people on sick leave with a mental health disorder, on return to work and mental health care utilization. METHODS AND
findingsIn this experimental study, sickness absentees were referred from a sick leave benefit management agency. Before intervention allocation, they had already received a standard health assessment in general practice. The intervention group received an additional specialized mental health assessment, while the control group did not. We compared the groups on several vocational outcome measures, the primary being proportion in work after one year. Other outcomes were weeks in work, time to return to work (RTW) and different measures of service utilization. We included 717 in the intervention group and 756 in the control group. On the primary outcome, proportion in work, we observed no differences between the groups at 12 months (53.9% vs. 58.7% in the control group, p = 0.133). Moreover, after one year, the control group showed faster RTW at 12-month follow-up (HR 0.79, p<0.001) and 3.1 more weeks in work (p<0.001). In the intervention group, participants received more hospital-based outpatient mental healthcare.
conclusionProviding a specialized mental health assessment was associated with fewer weeks in work and longer sick leave duration (secondary outcomes), but the proportion in work at 12-month follow-up (primary outcome) did not differ between the groups. The intervention was associated with a higher likelihood of receiving specialized mental healthcare services, perhaps because more needs were met. Given the substantial risk of selection bias, results should be treated with caution.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.