Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41661697›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2024

Examining recurrent hurricane exposure and psychiatric morbidity in Medicaid-insured pregnant populations.

Kelsey Herbst, Natasha P Malmin, Sudeshna Paul, Trey Williamson, Margaret M Sugg, Carl J Schreck, Jennifer D Runkle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kelsey HerbstNorth Carolina Institute for Climate Studies, North Carolina State University, Asheville, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7449-2497
Natasha P MalminSchool of Public Health Department of Population Health Sciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4711-0915
Sudeshna PaulNell Hodgson School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Trey WilliamsonNorth Carolina Institute for Climate Studies, North Carolina State University, Asheville, North Carolina, United States of America.
Margaret M SuggDepartment of Geography and Planning, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina, United States of America.
Carl J SchreckNorth Carolina Institute for Climate Studies, North Carolina State University, Asheville, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9331-5754
Jennifer D RunkleNorth Carolina Institute for Climate Studies, North Carolina State University, Asheville, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4611-1745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wide-ranging mental health consequences of a major hurricane have been widely documented, but important gaps remain in understanding the mental health burden of recurrent exposure to multiple hurricanes. The objective of this study was to examine the mental health burden in at-risk pregnant populations recurrently exposed to major hurricanes Matthew (2016), Florence (2018), Michael (2018), and Dorian (2019). Daily emergency department (ED) admissions were obtained on pregnant Medicaid beneficiaries for incident maternal disorders of pregnancy (MDP), perinatal mood and anxiety disorders (PMAD), severe mental illness (SMI), and substance use (SUD). County-level hurricane exposure was derived from a novel meteorologic-based Hurricane Insurance Protection- Wind Index (HIP-WI) metric. A difference-in-difference analysis assessed county-level changes in ED-related visits for psychiatric morbidity in pregnant populations following single hurricane events and a marginal Generalized Estimating Equation model assessed the cumulative impact of recurrent county-level hurricane exposure. A total of 258,157 (59.0%) pregnant cases were exposed to no storms, 113,157 (25.8%) were exposed to one storm, and 66,407 (15.2%) were exposed to two or more storms. Results showed higher risks for MDP after Matthew (RR: 1.83, 95%CI: 1.53, 2.18) and after Florence (RR: 1.09, 95%CI: 0.99, 1.19); higher risk of SMI (RR: 1.46, 95%CI: 1.11, 1.91) and PMAD (RR: 1.52, 95%CI: 1.32, 1.74) after Matthew. Compared to no storm exposure, exposure to two or more storms was associated with a higher risk of MDP (RR: 1.58, 95% CI [1.47,1.63]); PMAD (RR: 1.51, 95% CI [1.44, 1.59]); and SMI (RR: 1.34, 95% CI [1.23, 1.47]). Access to maternity care services, urbanity, and economic and residential segregation were important effect modifiers. Our population-based ecological study demonstrated that cumulative hurricane exposure confers an increased risk for psychological morbidity in pregnant Medicaid beneficiaries, particularly for mood and anxiety disorders, incident mental disorders, and severe mental illness for a Southern state outside of the U.S. Gulf Coast.

Identifiers

PMID41661697
PMCPMC12798489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.