ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026
Identifying High-Priority Ecological-Level Indicators of Structural Racism in Black and Hispanic/Latino Communities.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developing an Index to Measure Structural Racism: Methodological Process, Challenges, and Considerations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structural racism manifests as a multifaceted phenomenon in which various social and structural drivers of health can carry different levels of significance and impact. This study used a theory-driven approach to identify high-priority key ecological-level manifestations of structural racism to inform the development of a novel, multilevel, and multidimensional structural racism measure for Black and Hispanic/Latino communities. Based on the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities framework, a content development team of four social epidemiologists pre-selected 68 ecological indicators of structural racism from the previous literature. The panel comprised five health equity researchers, two social stratification researchers, and three community organization leaders, all of whom engaged in a modified Delphi process. In the final phase, eight out of ten panel members evaluated the relevance of each ecological-level indicator for assessing structural racism, using a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (extremely relevant) to 5 (not at all relevant). The average relevance score for each indicator was visualized using Python Matplotlib and Seaborn for data visualization. Overall, economic-related indicators were ranked as highly relevant, suggesting that financial stability measures are priority metrics for measuring structural racism among Black and Hispanic/ Latino communities. This study offers empirical evidence for prioritizing key ecological-level indicators of structural racism and for developing a weighted measure of structural racism for Black and Hispanic/Latino communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41661530What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.