SynthesisInfection2026
Emerging resistance to imipenem-relebactam among enterobacterales and non-fermenting gram-negative bacilli: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial activity of aztreonam/avibactam and molecular characterization of Enterobacterales not susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam and/or meropenem/vaborbactam from US medical centres (2016-2024).The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Jalisco, Mexico: a snapshot of regional resistance (2021-2023).Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMultidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pose a growing global health threat with limited treatment options. Imipenem-relebactam (IMI/REL) is a promising therapy, but emerging resistance patterns remain poorly defined worldwide.
objectivesThis meta-analysis aimed to provide a comprehensive assessment of global IMI/REL resistance among Enterobacterales and non-fermenting GNB, highlighting species-specific, geographic, and temporal patterns.
methodsStudies were searched in Scopus, PubMed, and EMBASE (until October 23 2024), and all statistical analyses were conducted using R (ver. 4.2.1).
resultsA total of 149,396 Enterobacterales and non-fermenting GNB were included. Overall, IMI/REL resistance was low at 8.8% (95% CI 7.3-10.5), with Enterobacterales showing the lowest resistance (2.9%) and Pseudomonas the highest (30.7%). Resistance was higher in carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and non-fermenting species, and varied by infection source and geography. Temporal analysis indicated a rising trend in resistance over recent years, while data were mostly derived from the Americas, limiting global generalizability.
conclusionIMI/REL remains largely effective against Enterobacterales, including ESBL and MDR strains, but resistance is increasing in high-risk subgroups and non-fermenting bacteria. These findings underscore the need for local susceptibility testing, cautious empiric therapy, and robust antimicrobial stewardship to preserve the efficacy of IMI/REL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41661521What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.