ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Precise volume assessment for gastrocnemius muscles based on 3D ultrasound imaging.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate muscle volume measurement is crucial for evaluating muscle impairment in healthcare and sports medicine. Compared to traditional methods, 3D ultrasound imaging offers noninvasive, flexible, cost-effectiveness advantages. This study aims to develop a precise volume assessment method for skeletal muscle, specifically gastrocnemius muscle, based on 3D ultrasound imaging. A feasible practice integrating 3D freehand ultrasound imaging based on optical tracking, slice extraction and alpha-shape-based surface reconstruction was proposed for precise volume assessment. 2D ultrasound images with spatial positions were acquired. Target slices were extracted for segmentation, and the alpha‑shape algorithm reconstructed the 3D muscle mesh for volume calculation. Phantom experiment using a pork tenderloin validated our method with a relative deviation of 0.47% compared to water displacement method. Clinical validation against MRI yielded relative deviations of 0.66% to 5.06% for manual segmentation and 0.28% to 2.58% for automated segmentation (using TransUNet). The method achieved smooth, detailed surfaces and outperformed Marching Cubes and Poisson reconstruction in accuracy and morphological fidelity. The proposed 3D freehand ultrasound workflow enables precise, detailed muscle volume assessment, showing strong agreement with MRI. Its accessibility and accuracy suggest significant potential for clinical and sports medicine applications in monitoring muscle health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41661508What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.