Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41661497›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasound2026

Integrating morphology, vascularity, and elasticity: diagnostic role of multiparametric quantitative ultrasound in breast lesions.

Paridhi Sabharwal, Narinder Kaur, Ravinder Kaur, Rajesh Bansiwal, Ranjeev Bhagat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paridhi SabharwalDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh, 160030, India. paridhisabharwal1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8584-7353
Narinder KaurDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh, 160030, India.
Ravinder KaurDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh, 160030, India.
Rajesh BansiwalDepartment of Surgery, Government of Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Ranjeev BhagatDepartment of Pathology, Government of Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the incremental diagnostic value of multiparametric quantitative ultrasound-integrating B-mode, Color Doppler, Strain, and Shear Wave Elastography (SWE)-in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions, using histopathology/FNAC as the gold standard.

methodsSeventy patients with 87 breast lesions underwent comprehensive ultrasound by a resident and a consultant radiologist (> 20 years' experience) with consensus reporting. Each lesion was evaluated using B-mode (BI-RADS), Color Doppler (vascularity, resistive and pulsatility indices), Strain elastography (strain ratio), and SWE (stiffness in kPa). Pathological correlation was available for all lesions. Diagnostic performance of individual and combined parameters was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and ROC analysis. Multivariate logistic regression evaluated incremental value of multiparametric combinations.

resultsB-mode had the highest sensitivity (88.37%) and accuracy (82.76%), Color Doppler the highest specificity (95.45%) but low sensitivity (55.81%), while Strain and SWE showed balanced performance, with SWE achieving the highest accuracy (85.06%) and AUC (0.85). Adding Color Doppler or Strain to B-mode provided no additional benefit. Incorporating SWE improved specificity (88.64%) and accuracy (85.06%). B-mode + Strain + Color Doppler achieved 83.91% accuracy, whereas B-mode + SWE + Color Doppler provided the highest overall performance (sensitivity 86.05%, specificity 86.36%, accuracy 86.21%, AUC 0.86). The four-parameter model (B-mode + Color Doppler + Strain + SWE) showed 83.72% sensitivity, 86.36% specificity, AUC 0.85, and 85.06% accuracy, performing comparably but marginally inferior to the best triple combination (B-mode + Color Doppler + SWE), likely due to redundancy and threshold effects, indicating that adding Strain did not improve performance.

conclusionMultiparametric ultrasound enhances lesion differentiation. B-mode ensures sensitivity, Color Doppler confirms benign vascular patterns, and SWE provides quantitative stiffness assessment. Combining morphology, vascularity, and stiffness-particularly B-mode + SWE + Color Doppler-yields the highest diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsElasticity Imaging TechniquesUltrasonography, MammaryAdultAgedBreastDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonography, Doppler, ColorB-modeBreast lesionsColor DopplerMultiparametric ultrasoundShear wave elastographyStrain elastography

Identifiers

PMID41661497
PMCPMC13000076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.