Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41661443›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2026

Digital Biomarkers in Depression: Integrating DSM-5-TR Symptomatology and RDoC Psychological Systems.

Sakshi Malik, Priyanka Srivastava

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sakshi MalikDepartment of Applied Psychology, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research Studies, Faridabad, India. sakshimalik.sbss@mriu.edu.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-2292-7562
Priyanka SrivastavaDepartment of Applied Psychology, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research Studies, Faridabad, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9037-1303

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewThe conventional approaches for diagnosing and monitoring major depressive disorder such as clinical interviews, structured assessments, and self-reporting scales. Moreover, it relies heavily on patient self-disclosure, clinician judgment, and observational data, which can lead to subjectivity and recall bias. These approaches are unable to capture the real-time dynamics of symptoms. This review aims to synthesise the current state of digital biomarkers, critically examine their clinical relevance, real-world applicability and alignment with DSM-5-TR symptoms and RDoC constructs. RECENT

findingsIn our review, we found that passive digital biomarkers, including activity and mobility patterns, location diversity, sleep-wake variables, speech and language features, communication behaviour, and cognitive-motor posters, had meaningful correlations with core domains of depression symptoms such as anhedonia, psychomotor disturbance, sleep dysregulation, cognitive impairment and social withdrawal. This review highlights the importance of combining DSM-5-TR symptomatology with RDoC psychological systems to improve the interpretability, standardisation, and translatability of digital phenotyping into clinical practice. Moving forward, digital psychiatry will need to focus on construct-level alignment, multimodal integration, and implementation in consultation, taking into account the feedback of clinicians, to assist in delivering an individual, sensitive, and holistic way of taking care of people with depression in various healthcare contexts.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersMajor Depressive DisorderDigital HealthDigital MediaHumansBiomarkersDigital biomarkersDigital phenotypingDSM-5-TREtcMajor depressive disorderPassive sensingRDoC

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.