ArticleFamilial cancer2026
Single institution assessment of physician compliance and patient uptake with guideline directed aspirin therapy in the prevention of colorectal cancer in lynch syndrome.
Article in Familial cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) have been shown to have up to an 60% lifetime risk of developing colorectal cancer. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend LS patients consider taking aspirin (ASA) daily to reduce their risk of colorectal cancer, which is primarily based on the Cancer Prevention Project 2 (CAPP-2) study results. In this study, we evaluated the uptake of guideline directed aspirin therapy among LS patients at Geisinger Inherited Risk Gastrointestinal clinic (IRGI). Medical records of 177 patients were retrospectively reviewed from May 2016 to December 2022. After excluding those with missing data or lost to follow-up, our study cohort consisted of 167 patients. Demographics, affected genes, clinical history, and ASA use were collected. Chi-square test and unpaired T-test were used to evaluate the association between various parameters and ASA use. With a median annual follow up of 36 months and adjustment for patients with relative and absolute contraindications to ASA, 58.5% (83/142) of patients were compliant with ASA therapy. Nearly half 49.4% (41/83) of ASA users took 81 mg daily, 1.2% (1/83) took 250 mg daily, 42.2% (35/83) took 325 mg daily and only 7.2% (6/83) reported taking > 600 mg daily. Relatively older patients were significantly more likely to take ASA compared to those not taking ASA (p-value = 0.025). The success of guideline focused discussion in encouragement of daily ASA use as primary prophylaxis in colorectal cancer amongst LS patients is likely multifactorial and beyond absolute medical contraindications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41661407What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.