Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41661405›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026

Fast and accurate iterative reconstruction using a volume integral model with look-up tables for pinhole SPECT.

Yudai Nawano, Koichi Ogawa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yudai NawanoDepartment of Applied Informatics, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Hosei University, 3-7-2 Kajinocho, Koganei, Tokyo, 184-8584, Japan.
Koichi OgawaDepartment of Applied Informatics, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Hosei University, 3-7-2 Kajinocho, Koganei, Tokyo, 184-8584, Japan. ogawa@hosei.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7137-9447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to propose an algorithm that efficiently computes detection probabilities—an essential factor in determining the relationship between voxels and detector bins in iterative reconstruction using the maximum-likelihood expectation–maximization (ML-EM) method—and accelerates the reconstruction process by tabulating this information. In the proposed method, each voxel was subdivided into sub-voxels and projected onto the detector to approximate the detection probabilities. Furthermore, by precomputing these data and using them as a look-up table (LUT), the method achieved computational acceleration while reducing memory usage. In this study, the proposed method was applied to three-dimensional pinhole SPECT imaging, and its effectiveness was evaluated using an ideal infinitesimal pinhole and a pinhole collimator with a 2-mm-diameter aperture. LUTs were also implemented for the distance-driven (DD) method and Siddon’s method, in which detection probabilities are computed on the fly, and comparative evaluations were performed. Normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) and normalized mean absolute error (NMAE) were used as metrics, and the methods were assessed in terms of the computation time required for table generation, the reconstruction time, and the storage size of the LUTs. The results demonstrated that the proposed method achieves higher reconstruction accuracy compared with the DD and Siddon’s methods.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalModels, TheoreticalTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAlgorithmsPhantoms, ImagingTime FactorsDetection probabilityImage reconstructionLook-up tableML-EM methodSPECT

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.