ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2026
Disease- and chemotherapy-associated salivary microbiome changes in breast cancer patients.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe microbiome of the saliva can be influenced by various factors, including systemic diseases and chemotherapy. Oral dysbiosis manifests as altered bacterial composition and abundance, which often correlates with increased local and systemic inflammation. The aim of the study was to investigate the dysbiosis in the saliva of breast cancer (BC) patients before and during neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).
methodsSaliva samples were collected from 50 breast cancer patients at three timepoints (before, during, and after NAC). Saliva from 10 healthy women was used as control samples. Full-length gene 16S rRNA sequencing and analysis were performed using the Microbiome Analyst platform, R and JADBIO AutomatedML platform to compare the abundances of bacterial taxa.
resultsAlpha and beta diversity measures differed between breast cancer patients and healthy controls. In addition, eight bacterial genera differed significantly between breast cancer patients and controls, including Porphyromonas, Campylobacter, Oribacterium, Veillonella, and Alloprevotella. Longitudinal analysis revealed significant decrease of bacterial diversity in the course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as significant change in the prevalence of a few low-abundant genera.
conclusionsThe obtained results confirm BC-related and NAC-related dysbiosis in saliva, which emphasizes the potential of saliva as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in patients with breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41661346What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.