ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Imaging of eosinophilic pneumonia : Differential diagnosis in radiological practice].
Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical/methodical issueEosinophilic pneumonias are rare inflammatory lung diseases with heterogeneous clinical presentation and variable computer tomography (CT) patterns. Overlap with infectious, drug-induced, or neoplastic entities poses a diagnostic challenge in radiological practice. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL
methodsHigh-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is the key imaging modality. Typical findings range from transient ground-glass opacities to peripheral, nonsegmental consolidations. CT allows assessment of distribution, temporal evolution, and relevant differential diagnoses. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Advanced imaging techniques currently play a minor role. Quantitative CT and artificial intelligence (AI)-based pattern analysis are under investigation but not yet implemented in routine clinical practice. PERFORMANCE: CT provides high sensitivity for detecting parenchymal abnormalities but limited specificity. Diagnostic accuracy relies on the integration of imaging findings with clinical data, laboratory results, and response to corticosteroid therapy. ACHIEVEMENTS: CT is a well-established and indispensable tool for diagnosis and follow-up. Novel techniques remain largely experimental. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: In the presence of characteristic CT patterns and compatible clinical findings, eosinophilic pneumonia should be considered early. Lack of response to corticosteroids should prompt reassessment of the diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41661280What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.