Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41661245›Full record

ReviewInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Concepts to improve medication safety in older patients].

Hanna M Seidling, Annette Eidam, Jürgen M Bauer, Julia C Stingl

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hanna M SeidlingMedizinische Fakultät Heidelberg/Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Innere Medizin IX - Abteilung für Klinische Pharmakologie und Pharmakoepidemiologie, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. hanna.seidling@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Annette EidamGeriatrisches Zentrum, Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Jürgen M BauerGeriatrisches Zentrum, Medizinische Fakultät Heidelberg, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Julia C StinglMedizinische Fakultät Heidelberg/Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Innere Medizin IX - Abteilung für Klinische Pharmakologie und Pharmakoepidemiologie, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are specific high-risk situations in routine care that are particularly challenging for medication safety. Examples of such situations include patients with polypharmacy or transitions between health care sectors, such as hospital discharge. Both scenarios become more frequent with increasing patient age and often coincide with a reduced capacity to handle medication in daily life (medication management capacity). This combination increases the risk of critical incidents in care. Therefore, a number of strategies have been developed and tested that aim to increase medication safety. While some of these strategies specifically target older patients (e.g., medication reviews conducted in long-term care facilities), other strategies may be adapted for an older population (e.g., education and training for correct drug administration). This article provides an overview of strategies to improve medication safety in the older population and also highlights specific challenges that may arise when implementing these strategies.

Indexed as

Medication ErrorsPatient SafetyAgedAged, 80 and overHumansPolypharmacyHealth services researchMedication errorsMedication safety measuresOlder patientsPolypharmacy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.