Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41661223›Full record

SynthesisThe veterinary quarterly2026

Ultrasonographic evaluation of the normal gastrointestinal wall in dogs and cats: a systematic review on study design and imaging outcomes.

Marisa Esteves-Monteiro, Margarida Duarte-Araújo, Clara Landolt, Cláudia S Baptista

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The veterinary quarterly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marisa Esteves-MonteiroAssociated Laboratory for Green Chemistry of the Network of Chemistry and Technology (LAQV@REQUIMTE), University of Porto (UP), Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0585-3905
Margarida Duarte-AraújoAssociated Laboratory for Green Chemistry of the Network of Chemistry and Technology (LAQV@REQUIMTE), University of Porto (UP), Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4727-727X
Clara LandoltVeterinary Hospital of the University of Porto (UPVet), ICBAS-UP, Porto, Portugal.
Cláudia S BaptistaVeterinary Hospital of the University of Porto (UPVet), ICBAS-UP, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8158-4743

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnostic ultrasound (US) is a noninvasive, cost-effective imaging modality widely used for evaluating the gastrointestinal (GI) tract in companion animals. It provides information on wall thickness and layer differentiation, allowing assessment of normal anatomy and pathological changes. Despite its diagnostic relevance, ultrasonographic reference values for the GI tract in dogs and cats remain inconsistent across publications. This study reviewed ultrasonographic characteristics of the normal GI wall in dogs and cats and compiled a consensus-based reference table for overall wall thickness and individual layer proportions to enhance clinical interpretation. A literature search of PubMed and Scopus identified studies assessing the ultrasonographic features of normal GI segments, from stomach to colon, in healthy dogs and cats. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria: six focused on dogs and six on cats. Reference values for GI wall thickness and its layers were reported in both species. However, discrepancies were noted in weight-based classifications for dogs, and the stomach of adult dogs remains poorly studied. Moreover, evaluation of gastric rugal and inter-rugal folds remains limited in this species. US is valuable for GI assessment, but dispersion of reference values across studies may hinder accessibility. Establishing standardized ultrasonographic parameters could improve diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal TractAnimalsCatsDogsReference ValuesUltrasonographyCaninediagnostic ultrasounddisease-free gastrointestinal wallfelinereview

Identifiers

PMID41661223
PMCPMC12888347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.