ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026
Transcriptomic Subgroups in Soft Tissue Tumors Correlate with Morphologic Subtype, Genomic Features, and Outcome.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-assisted multimodal data integration for precision oncology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSoft tissue tumors (STT) are highly heterogeneous neoplasms with more than 100 recognized subtypes, many of which lack reliable diagnostic or prognostic markers. We aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of transcriptome sequencing [RNA sequencing (RNA-seq)] in classifying STTs and identifying prognostically relevant subgroups. EXPERIMENTAL
designWe performed RNA-seq on 704 tumors representing 56 histologic subtypes, integrating global gene expression (GGE) profiles, fusion transcript detection, genomic features, and clinicopathologic data. Unsupervised clustering and machine learning approaches were used to refine tumor classification and identify prognostic transcriptomic signatures.
resultsWe identified more than 200 pathogenic gene fusion transcripts, including 40 not previously described. Strong GGE profiles were seen for many morphologic subtypes, especially for those characterized by specific gene fusions. Sarcomas with complex genomes, such as myxofibrosarcoma, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma (LMS), showed less distinct GGE profiles, and for LMS, subclusters correlating with genomic profiles were seen. On the basis of GGE profiles and other data, the diagnosis was changed in 5.7% of the cases. Comparison with follow-up data identified transcriptional subclusters among sarcomas with complex genomes that correlated with metastasis-free survival.
conclusionsTranscriptomic profiling enhances diagnostic precision, uncovers novel oncogenic fusions, and provides prognostic information in STTs. Still, the results of the current study suggest that, due to the morphologic and clinical diversity of these tumors, multicenter collaborative studies are needed to fully explore the potential of RNA-seq in STTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.