ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2026
Digital neuropsychological assessment-part 1: Defining mild cognitive impairment subtypes.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundIn prior research, the Digital Assessment of Cognition (DAC), a brief digitally administered neuropsychological protocol that assesses verbal episodic memory, verbal working memory, and language, has been used to classify a small sample of memory clinic patients (n = 77) into four meaningful clinical groups.ObjectiveThe current research sought to extend these findings with a considerably larger sample.MethodsThe DAC was administered to 179 ambulatory care/memory clinic patients (45.30% female; 91.10% Caucasian). A comprehensive analysis of DAC core outcome measures and behavior reflecting process/errors was undertaken. Traditional paper/pencil assessment was also obtained. Using Jak, Bondi criteria (2009), paper/pencil test results classified patients into five groups: cognitively unimpaired (CU; n = 74), subtle cognitive impairment (SCI; n = 21), amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI; n = 21), combined dysexecutive/mixed MCI (dys/mxMCI; n = 22), and mild dementia (n = 41).ResultsThe aMCI group presented with many of the classic features consistent with amnesia, i.e., rapid forgetting, reduced free recall clustering, and profligate responding to recognition foils. Latency for correct recognition responding was slower for aMCI compared to the CU group and appears to be associated with a neurocognitive network measuring both memory and language-related operations. SCI and dys/mxMCI groups tended to produce more perseverations on working memory test trials; and produced lower scores on DAC executive outcome measures that assessed auditory span and semantic fluency.ConclusionsThese findings support the criterion and construct validity of the DAC. When brought to scale the DAC could be an effective tool to assess for emergent MCI and dementia syndromes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.