Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41660954›Full record

ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2026

Digital neuropsychological assessment-part 1: Defining mild cognitive impairment subtypes.

David J Libon, Deborah Drabick, Rod Swenson, Sean Tobyne, Sheina Emrani, Ondrej Bezdicek, Laura Salciunas, Aeysha J Brown, Terri Ginsberg, Mitchel Kling and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

David J LibonDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6617-6066
Deborah DrabickDepartment of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rod SwensonUniversity of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Grand Foks, ND, USA.
Sean TobyneLinus Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Sheina EmraniDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ondrej BezdicekDepartment of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Laura SalciunasDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, USA.
Aeysha J BrownDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, USA.
Terri GinsbergDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, USA.
Mitchel KlingDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, USA.
Kevin OverbeckDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, USA.
Leonard PowellDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, USA.
Christian WhiteDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, USA.
Adaora Okoli-UmeweniDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, USA.
Christopher JansonDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, USA.
Stephen ScheinthalDepartment of Geriatrics and Gerontology, New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, Rowan-Virtua School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundIn prior research, the Digital Assessment of Cognition (DAC), a brief digitally administered neuropsychological protocol that assesses verbal episodic memory, verbal working memory, and language, has been used to classify a small sample of memory clinic patients (n = 77) into four meaningful clinical groups.ObjectiveThe current research sought to extend these findings with a considerably larger sample.MethodsThe DAC was administered to 179 ambulatory care/memory clinic patients (45.30% female; 91.10% Caucasian). A comprehensive analysis of DAC core outcome measures and behavior reflecting process/errors was undertaken. Traditional paper/pencil assessment was also obtained. Using Jak, Bondi criteria (2009), paper/pencil test results classified patients into five groups: cognitively unimpaired (CU; n = 74), subtle cognitive impairment (SCI; n = 21), amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI; n = 21), combined dysexecutive/mixed MCI (dys/mxMCI; n = 22), and mild dementia (n = 41).ResultsThe aMCI group presented with many of the classic features consistent with amnesia, i.e., rapid forgetting, reduced free recall clustering, and profligate responding to recognition foils. Latency for correct recognition responding was slower for aMCI compared to the CU group and appears to be associated with a neurocognitive network measuring both memory and language-related operations. SCI and dys/mxMCI groups tended to produce more perseverations on working memory test trials; and produced lower scores on DAC executive outcome measures that assessed auditory span and semantic fluency.ConclusionsThese findings support the criterion and construct validity of the DAC. When brought to scale the DAC could be an effective tool to assess for emergent MCI and dementia syndromes.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionNeuropsychological TestsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMemory, EpisodicMemory, Short-TermMiddle AgedAlzheimer's diseasebackward digit span testBoston process approachdigital assessment of cognitionepisodic memoryexecutive controlmild cognitive impairmentPhiladelphia (repeatable) verbal learning test

Identifiers

PMID41660954
PMCPMC12982564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.