ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2026
Myopia Prescription Based on Smartphone App: A Feasibility Study in Africa.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Utilization of a self-refracting system on the streets to improve vision in an urban unhoused population.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Uncorrected refractive error (URE) is the leading cause of vision impairment, especially in rural, underserved areas. We previously evaluated the accuracy of a smartphone app for measuring spherical equivalent refraction. In this study, we evaluated the benefits of vision correction based on the prescription given by the app. Methods: The app estimates myopic refractive error by measuring the far point distances for reading 20/20 Tumbling E letters. Trial lenses rounded to 0.25 diopter (D) were fitted to 100 patients (myopic refractive error, astigmatism < 1.5 D) visiting MCM Eye Unit in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. The age range of the participants was 10 to 68 years (mean = 31.3 ± 13.0 years). The refraction measurement and visual acuity (VA) tests were all performed without cycloplegia. Results: The range of spherical equivalent refractive error was -0.5 D to -6 D (interquartile range [IQR] = -2.25 D to -0.95 D), and the range of astigmatism was 0 to -1.25 D (IQR = -0.5 D to 0 D), according to subjective refraction performed by a study optometrist. On average, the uncorrected VA of the 200 eyes was 0.57 ± 0.32 logMAR. With the spherical equivalent correction based on the refraction app, their VA was improved significantly to 0.03 ± 0.09 logMAR-more than 5 lines of improvement, on average. Conclusions: This study indicates that using the app to determine the spherical equivalent prescription for vision correction addresses the URE problem, whereas its effect for prominent astigmatism is yet to be evaluated. Translational Relevance: This approach, which requires minimal training, has potential in fighting avoidable blindness in underserved areas lacking optometry services, such as remote Sub-Saharan Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.