ArticleArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2025
APACHE II, SOFA, and SAPS III after transhiatal and thoracoscopic in prone position esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort analysis.
Article in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEsophagectomy is a major, invasive, and long-lasting surgery performed in patients with comorbidities and compromised nutritional conditions. The historical challenges of surgical treatment of esophageal cancer are to overcome mortality, improve survival, and decrease morbidity.
aimsThe aim of the study is to compare the intraoperative morbidity of two distinct surgical techniques of esophagectomy in esophageal cancer, transhiatal esophagectomy and video-assisted thoracoscopy in the prone position, analyzing intraoperative physiological parameters, scores on admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (APACHE II, SOFA, and SAPS III), and postoperative evolution.
methodsRetrospective, cross-sectional study evaluating patients admitted to the ICU in the immediate postoperative period of elective esophagectomy for esophageal neoplasia (squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma). Data were obtained from a computerized registry database of the ICU and from patient records.
resultsSixty-three patients over 18 years of age were evaluated and divided into two groups: 31 (49.21%) underwent transhiatal esophagectomy, and 32 (50.79%) underwent videoassisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy. No statistically significant difference was observed for length of ICU stay (p=0.5309), length of postoperative hospital stay (p=0.3066), or death in the perioperative period (30 days, p=0.6562). Regarding intraoperative parameters, no statistically significant difference was observed for patients who received blood transfusion (p=0.2097); amount in milliliters (p=0.2893); patients who used vasoactive drugs (VADs) (p=0.9243); time VAD use (p=0.9327); volume of fluids infused in milliliters (p=0.7825); or diuresis in milliliters (p=0.7286). A statistically significant difference was observed for surgical time (310 min in transhiatal esophagectomy vs. 373 min in video-assisted thoracoscopy, p=0.0012) and anesthetic time (385 minutes in transhiatal vs. 467 min in video-assisted thoracoscopy, p<0.0001). A statistically significant difference was observed in the number of patients extubated at the end of the procedure (48.38% in transhiatal vs. 9.37% in video-assisted thoracoscopy, p=0.0022). Regarding gasometric parameters at the end of the surgical procedure, only pO2 showed a statistically significant difference (p=0.0010). Regarding ICU admission scores, there were no differences regarding APACHE II (p=0.6542), SOFA (p=0.8949), and SAPS III (p=0.7656).
conclusionsThis study showed no differences between the transhiatal and thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position, in prognostic score performance, studied operative parameters, ICU stay and hospital stay times, and perioperative mortality, in agreement with literature findings. The advent of minimally invasive techniques in video-assisted esophagectomies brought the same benefits as thoracotomy, offering greater safety in mediastinal dissection under direct vision, in addition to mitigating the physiological repercussions of thoracotomies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.