ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2026
Predictors of Secondary Traumatic Stress among Oncology Nurses in Palestine.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of secondary traumatic stress in nurses: a meta-analysis of observational studies.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Prevalence of secondary traumatic stress and its associated factors among oncology nurses: a multicenter cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe work environment of oncology nurses exposes them to patient suffering, making them vulnerable to developing Secondary Traumatic Stress (STS). Most research on STS has been conducted in high-income countries with stable healthcare systems, whereas little is known about its occurrence or risk factors in conflict-affected regions. This study aims to determine the prevalence of STS and identify its predictors among Palestinian oncology nurses who face unstable political conditions, insufficient resources, and limited mental health services.
methodsA cross-sectional analytical study was conducted in ten oncology departments across hospitals in the West Bank and East Jerusalem between August and October 2024. A total of 293 participants completed a questionnaire assessing sociodemographic characteristics, STS, burnout, social and organizational support, and coping strategies. Data were analyzed using SPSS 27 with descriptive and inferential statistics, including regression analyses to identify significant predictors.
resultsThe mean STS score was 3.13 ± 0.73, with the intrusion-related symptoms being most prominent (3.18 ± 0.94). STS levels varied significantly with age, working hours, and parental status. Regression analysis identified the number of children as a negative predictor of STS (B = -0.081, p = 0.004), while education level (B = 0.096, p = 0.034) and Personal Accomplishment (B = 0.015, p < 0.001) were positive predictors. Perceived Organizational Support remained a strong negative predictor (B = -0.109, p < 0.001).
conclusionThis study provides the first evidence of STS among oncology nurses in a conflict-affected work environment. Strengthening organizational support and tailoring coping strategies to the local context may help reduce STS while promoting nurse well-being. These findings underscore the global relevance of integrating stress management programs into oncology education and workplace policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.