ArticlemBio2026
Efficient detection and typing of phage-plasmids.
Article in mBio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Unified Human Virome Database: A toolkit for expanded human virome analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Phage-plasmid-like elements are found throughout diverse environments and encode niche-specific functional traits.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phage-plasmids (P-Ps) are temperate phages that replicate as plasmids during lysogeny. Despite their high diversity, they carry genes similar to phages and plasmids. This leads to gene exchanges and to the formation of hybrid or defective elements, which limits accurate detection of P-Ps. To address this challenge, we developed tyPPing, an easy-to-use method that efficiently detects and types P-Ps with high accuracy. It searches for distinct frequencies and sets of conserved proteins to separate P-Ps from plasmids and phages. tyPPing's strength comes from both its precise predictions and its ability to systematically type P-Ps, including the assignment of confidence levels. We tested tyPPing on several databases and a collection of incomplete (draft) genomes. While predictions rely on the quality of assemblies, we detected high-quality P-Ps and experimentally proved them to be functional. Compared to other classification methods, tyPPing is designed to detect distinct P-P types and surpasses other tools in terms of sensitivity and scalability. P-Ps are highly diverse, making the systematic identification of new types a difficult task. By combining tyPPing with other tools, however, we show a valuable foundation for addressing this challenge. How to use tyPPing and other approaches is documented in our GitHub repository: github.com/EpfeiferNutri/Phage-plasmids/. IMPORTANCE: Mobile genetic elements, such as phages and plasmids, are diverse and drive bacterial evolution through horizontal gene transfer. Phage-plasmids, of which many carry antibiotic resistance genes or virulence factors, are both phages and plasmids and have life cycles of temperate phages and plasmids. This makes accurate classification difficult as current computational tools typically classify them as one or the other. We addressed this problem by developing tyPPing, a new and highly precise method, to systematically identify, separate, and catalog phage-plasmids. We demonstrated that tyPPing is highly accurate and broadly compatible. It provides a reliable foundation for all future studies involving phages and plasmids, ranging from agriculture environments to pathogenic strains of clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.