Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41660858›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Surgeons2026

Association Between Surgical Robotic Availability and Open Operation Rate: A Geographic Analysis.

Zhi Ven Fong, Charles K Anderson, Elizabeth Wall-Wieler, Zahra A Fazal, Nikhil Sahai, Don Hoeler, Pamela C Lee, Brian Mitzman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhi Ven FongFrom the Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ (Ven Fong).
Charles K AndersonDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Willamette Valley Cancer Institute and Research Center, Eugene, OR (Anderson).
Elizabeth Wall-WielerHealth Policy and Patient Access Research, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA (Wall-Wieler, Fazal, Sahai, Hoeler).
Zahra A FazalHealth Policy and Patient Access Research, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA (Wall-Wieler, Fazal, Sahai, Hoeler).
Nikhil SahaiHealth Policy and Patient Access Research, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA (Wall-Wieler, Fazal, Sahai, Hoeler).
Don HoelerHealth Policy and Patient Access Research, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA (Wall-Wieler, Fazal, Sahai, Hoeler).
Pamela C LeeDepartment of Surgery, Sharp Memorial Hospital, San Diego, CA (Lee).
Brian MitzmanDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (Mitzman).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the widespread adoption of minimally invasive surgery in the US, disparities in its use persist. One unexplored contributor is geographic access to robotic surgical systems. This study evaluates the geospatial association between: (1) Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and open surgery rates, (2) availability of robotic systems and open surgery, and (3) open surgery rates in demographically similar areas with differing robotic access. STUDY

designData from 6 sources were linked at the ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) level to identify hospitals and to extract procedure modality, presence of robotic systems, and area characteristics. Regression analysis assessed the association between SVI and open surgery rates. Open rates were then compared between hospitals with and without robotic systems. Propensity score matching was used to compare open rates across matched ZCTAs by robotic access and SVI levels.

resultsHigher social vulnerability was associated with increased open surgery rates (estimate = 0.20; p < 0.01), with rates ranging from 18.3% in low-vulnerability areas to 32.7% in high-vulnerability areas. Among 3,446 eligible ZCTAs, 57% had at least 1 robotic system. ZCTAs without robotic systems had higher open surgery rates (42.9 vs 19.4 per 100 procedures; relative rate = 2.21; p < 0.01). This association remained significant after matching (relative rate = 1.66; p < 0.01), for the low-mid- and high-SVI strata, and 3 of the 5 procedures examined.

conclusionsWhen correcting for geographic variation, the availability of robotic surgery was associated with a decrease in open surgery rates.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansPropensity ScoreUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41660858
PMCPMC13232704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.