ArticlePediatric pulmonology2026
Parents' Perceptions of Delays and Disabilities in Their Children Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.
Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Parents' Perceptions of Delays and Disabilities in Their Children Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation.Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess parents of children requiring invasive mechanical ventilation's (IMV) perceptions of their children's developmental delays and disabilities.
methodsParents of children <3 years of age who required IMV after neonatal disease were interviewed as a consecutive series from a state-wide agency (n = 20) and a ventilator clinic (n = 15). Interview topics included parents': (1) perception of their child's current developmental functioning, (2) understanding of their child's disability risks, and (3) prior conversations with providers about developmental milestones and disability risks. Interviews were coded using a modified template approach and discussed to consensus. Main and sub-themes were determined iteratively with all investigators.
resultsThirty-five parents were interviewed. Themes were categorized under two topics: (1) Parents' recall of conversations with providers; (2) Parents' perspectives on developmental delays. Topic 1 themes: (1) Despite wanting information on developmental outcomes, parents report unclear expectations for delay and disability based on limited conversations; (2) Parents reported a lack of access to neurodevelopmental expertise, most often directing questions to therapists or other parents. Topic 2 themes: (1) Parents can identify specific developmental milestones and delays; (2) Parents have an idea of overall disability, sometimes attributed to specific diagnoses or medical complexity; (3) Parents are hopeful for their child's future development.
conclusionParents of children requiring IMV value honesty about disability and recall few prior conversations. Most parents can identify developmental delays yet expect catch-up. Ultimately, improving communication between providers and parents about disability risk is critical to support children requiring IMV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.