ArticleJPRAS open2026
Clavicular augmentation with hyaluronic acid six-point technique: A novel non-surgical approach to skeletal definition.
Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clavicular augmentation using hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers is an innovative aesthetic intervention for improving skeletal prominence through minimally invasive methods. Successful application requires a precise, structured technique targeting the subperiosteal plane. Case presentation: We describe a novel standardized technique-the six-point technique for non-surgical clavicular augmentation and present the outcome in a 35-year-old female patient. Technique/Methods: Under strict aseptic conditions, 2.0 mL of HA filler (Lorient No. 6) was injected per side into the subperiosteal plane using a fine-gauge needle. The Six-Point Technique involves structured, differential dosing to restore linear continuity (0.5 mL in concavities) and refine convex highlights (0.3 mL along curves). Results: The procedure resulted in immediate and sustained enhancement of the clavicular line and improved upper-torso contour. At the 3-month follow-up, the patient reported high satisfaction (9/10), with no severe adverse events observed. Documented complications remained predominantly minor and temporary, including localized inflammation or discomfort, without any severe adverse outcomes reported. Conclusions: The HA clavicular augmentation six-point technique is a safe, versatile, and reversible option for achieving predictable skeletal definition. This structured, minimally invasive treatment provides consistent, aesthetically pleasing outcomes, underscoring the potential for injectable solutions in skeletal contouring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.