ReviewPalliative care and social practice2026
Death literacy: A document analysis review of the United Kingdom's four countries' policies.
Review in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Death literacy is an emerging concept within academic and social spheres, reflecting increasing recognition that people need to be better prepared for death and dying. The extent to which key features of death literacy are embedded in policies indicates how death and dying are framed and prioritised. Therefore, how the term 'death literacy' and its components have been adopted in UK governments' policies required exploration. This study aimed to analyse post-2015 UK state-level (Westminster) and national (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales) policies to explore how death literacy is framed and described. A document analysis of policies was conducted using the READ approach, comprising reading materials, data extraction, data analysis and distilling the findings. UK and national governments' and health services' websites were searched. A thematic policy analysis was conducted, mapping content to Noonan et al. - features of death literacy (knowledge, skills, experiential learning and social action). Key findings were outlined in a narrative format. Initially, 11,063 records were screened, 59 documents were eligible for data extraction and a final 22 papers were selected. Findings included that death literacy was not explicitly referenced, despite key features of death literacy being present. These elements focused on knowledge and skills relating to death and dying, including publics', caregivers' and professionals' understanding of end-of-life processes, predominantly relating to the skills of healthcare professionals. The policies also incorporated social action through community engagement and support. Elements of experiential learning, including coproduction of health services, were only referred to minimally. Despite no explicit reference to death literacy, key features were evident within UK policies, which focused on knowledge and skills relating to death and dying through palliative and end-of-life care processes. Future policies should explicitly outline a consolidated approach to death literacy, with the aim of improving experiences and preparedness relating to death, dying and end-of-life. These should embed strategies to implement multi-level, cross-departmental, and new public health approaches that addresses systemic inequalities, and to enhance experiential and socially focused initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.