ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
Artificial-intelligence-enabled digital stethoscope improves point-of-care screening for moderate-to-severe valvular heart disease.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Unimodal to multimodal: a systematic review of predictive machine learning models for valvular heart diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: Valvular heart disease (VHD) can affect more than one in two adults over 65 yet remains underdiagnosed due to the limitations of traditional auscultation. Earlier detection is critical for improving outcomes, but many cases go unrecognized. This study evaluates whether an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled digital stethoscope can augment primary care providers' (PCPs) ability to detect clinically significant VHD compared with analogue auscultation alone. Methods and results: In this prospective study, 357 patients aged ≥50 years at risk for heart disease underwent both analogue cardiac auscultation by PCPs (standard of care, SOC) and digital cardiac auscultation by study coordinators followed by AI analysis using an electronic stethoscope (AI-augmented). Echocardiography and audible murmur annotation served as the reference standard. Sensitivity and specificity of AI vs. SOC were compared using Fisher's exact test. The AI-augmented system demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (92.3% vs. 46.2%, Conclusion: Artificial intelligence-enabled digital stethoscopes significantly improve point-of-care VHD detection, offering a promising tool for earlier diagnosis and intervention in primary care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.