ArticleJournal of patient experience2026
Patient Experience in a Stroke Prevention Clinic: Guiding Quality Improvement in northeastern Ontario.
Article in Journal of patient experience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Identifying Clinician Perspectives on Current Stroke Care Gaps Across the Care Continuum: An Ontario, Canada-Focused Study.Health services insights · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient satisfaction is a key determinant of healthcare quality; however, its assessment in stroke prevention clinics (SPCs) remains inadequate. This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to establish a baseline for patient experience at an SPC in Northeastern Ontario. Our QI team developed a satisfaction survey based on the Donabedian Model. Conducted over 30 days in July 2025, 43 of 51 invited patients completed the survey, resulting in an 84% response rate. Qualitative feedback was gathered for the thematic analysis. Patients reported high satisfaction across the Donabedian framework domains, with over 90% understanding their care steps and feeling dignified. Pareto analysis identified discharge education as a key area for improvement. Despite an 88% satisfaction rate, this domain was prioritized to enhance post-discharge patient preparedness, potentially reducing readmission risk. A limitation of this study was the small, single-site, and brief data collection period. This initiative established a baseline for patient experience and highlighted post-discharge education as a critical area of improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.