ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2025
Automatic Explainable Segmentation of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm From Computed Tomography Angiography.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Integrated Framework for Automated Image Segmentation and Personalized Wall Stress Estimation of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work presents an automated deep learning (DL) based framework for segmenting abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography (CTA) images, which was developed to support AAA screening and analysis. The framework includes a dynamic router that assigns image regions to three specialized U-Net models, each trained to handle different aspects of the segmentation. It was trained and validated on 9,080 images and tested on 1,560 images representative of 22 unique patients. The model accurately segmented both the aortic lumen and the outer wall, achieving dice scores (DS) of 0.9648 and 0.9615, intersection over union (IoU) scores of 0.9324 and 0.9264, and Hausdorff distance (HD95) percentile values of 1.3490 mm and 1.3670 mm, respectively. The fully automated system processes each image frame in approximately 17 ± 1 milliseconds, making it suitable for real-time use. In certain complex cases where improved clinical accuracy is required, non-uniform rational B splines (NURBS) were used to manually refine the segmentation. In these cases, the NURBS correction time ranges from 3 to 20 seconds per frame. The framework's training and validation demonstrate its potential as a reliable tool for AAA detection and clinical decision-making. Future work should focus on integrating multimodal imaging and optimization of NURBS to further improve its accuracy and efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.